Since I have been using Linux pretty exclusively for a good 10 years now I have heard a lot of the same comments regards its ease of use and adoption by the masses. I think it is safe to say that the Distros of today are light years ahead of what we had 10 or even 5 years ago; yet the same complaints are still levied. Well, I am going to challenge some of those myths now with some thoughts I have picked up along the way. I don’t know how many parts this will be in, but here we go.
Linux is too hard for the general user because it is difficult to install.
First off, I will concede that someone who is not technical, or “geeky,” or struggles with technology will probably have a difficult time installing Linux. So yes, the average user would probably have a tough go at it. I say that with the fact that I did film my daughter (Pat has been working the videos, we should release them some day) installing Ubuntu before there was a graphical installer, when she was six without any help from me other than pronunciation of word. I just had her read what the directions said. Alas, maybe somehow I did pollute here with my technical savy. Anyway, if I am going to concede that installing Linux is difficult for the average user, I am going to take it one more. I think installing any operating system is going to be difficult for the average user. Let’s face it, there are a number of technicians out there who make a pretty penny installing or re-installing operating systems. So given that, I would then posit that windows is too difficult for the average user to install. OS X is too difficult for the average user to install.
Let me clarify what I mean by install. First, I do am not talking about a restore disc or partition provided by a computer manufacturer. No, I am talking about a plain vanilla Windows disc from Microsoft, and OS X install Disc from Apple, or an Ubuntu disc (yeah, I know there are other Linux distros out there but I am going to focus on Ubuntu for all intents and purposes here). Remember, we are comparing apples to apples; or as close to apples to apples here, not apples and oranges. Thus, comparing a system restore disc or partition to an out of the box copy of Windows Vista or XP is an apple to oranges comparison just as comparing those restore options to Ubuntu would be.
Therefore, if we validate that Ubuntu (Linux) is too difficult for the average user because the average user would either not be able to install or have a hard time installing Ubuntu (Linux on their computer); then we must equally validate the same statement when we replace Ubuntu with Windows (OS X, BSD, etc.). That is, Windows is too difficult for the average user because the average user would either not be able to install or would have a hard time installing Windows (OS X, BSD, etc). The installation of an operating system can not be used as a differentiator in the argument as to whether one operating system is a “better” choice for the general user because the installation of any operating system is a task the general user would find difficult at that very least and quite possibly beyond their current level of comfort.
Now note I said “comfort” and not “ability.” I chose comfort because I believe that most anyone who takes the time to learn how to install an operating system will be successful at installing the operating system. This is what I mean by getting your ducks in a row. Before you set to a task, make sure you have enough knowledge and resources to perform the task. As with any new venture like this; chances are there will be stumbling from which one will learn even more.
In my follow-up parts I will make a point to continue with “comparing apples to apples” and pointing out where it is important to have “one’s ducks in a row” as I tackle what I believe to be more myths levied at Linux in general.




